On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirc...@web.de>
wrote:

> adding uclibc snapshots maybe other (patched) variants
> might improve .... well some things (quality ? pressure to release new
> stable version?)
>

So we have some options:

1) use uclibc-snapshot.tar.bz2 instead of a dated, known working version
(though we can't check the md5sum)
2) use uclibc git at a specific revision
3) use uclibc git at head
4) anything I don't know about? uclibc-ng?

I'm leaning towards (2) at this point, and will send through a patch for
that.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to