Should we maybe switch to using iwinfo though ubus in our Lua code? Can we use that to scan for networks? Could that be a more robust solution? http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/ubus#lua_module_for_ubus https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=57554
If I understand the following two pages correctly the new luci (LuCI2) will also use ubus, over http. http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/luci2 http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/ubus#access_to_ubus_over_http On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich <j...@openwrt.org> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I suspect the culprit is nl80211_wait() which calls nl_recvmsgs() > internally. > > To overcome this problem we need to restructure the nl80211 code to use > nonblocking sockets and then extend the nl80211_wait() implementation to > have a timeout. > > ~ Jow > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
