On 15/09/2015 17:05, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> I see procd got an update. Any reason this patch was left out?
> 
> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:05 -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
>> Is there an ETA for merging this?
>>
>> On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 19:14 -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
>>> I'm intending for this fix to be backported to CC as well.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 09:59 -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
>>>> OpenSSL session caches create shared memory segments that appear as
>>>> files under /dev/shm. If there is not enough room there, execution
>>>> terminates with SIGBUS upon access. Even a single instance would
>>>> exceed
>>>> 512K.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 11:50 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>>>>> what kind of usage do you expect ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/07/2015 03:58, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
>>>>>> Since the /dev filesystem is tiny, /dev/shm needs to live
>>>> somewhere
>>>>>> else.


Hi,

there was no ... ah wait its a trap ... you were just impatient. i was
working on the release and after that i started working through patchwork.

        John
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to