> > People report bugs all the time, and if I'm lucky enough to have a bug > report containing revision information, I want to maximize the > likelihood of that revision information being useful (even if there are > some local commits on top of that). > Any assumptions about users thinking carefully if the revision info that > they're posting is meaningful enough is flawed. People usually just post > whatever is in the banner file. > Often bug reports can be anonymous, or reporters just don't respond > after posting the ticket. I don't want to compromise any remaining > usefulness of such tickets. > > > Though, I still think that appropriate, meaningful tags will be a > > better option to just r (which would be just svn legacy). > > Not sure but probably both options could be used in parallel. > A fake 'r' value is useless if I can't use it to look up the > corresponding OpenWrt commit. >
Supposing we are able to trace the exact base and the modifications, what would be left?
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel