On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com> wrote: > Hi Felix, > > On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:43 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> These are from today's master branch of: >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=tree >> >> In particular it adds support for ARC architecture plus some more >> improvements and fixes. >> >> This patch is built-tested against NetGear WNDR3800. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com> >> Cc: Florian Fainelli <flor...@openwrt.org> >> Cc: Imre Kaloz <ka...@openwrt.org> >> --- >> scripts/config.guess | 378 >> +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- >> scripts/config.sub | 150 ++++++++++++-------- >> 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 290 deletions(-) > > I'm wondering if there're any comments on this one. > Otherwise please consider applying. > > This patch is a prerequisite for ARC port submission I'm going to send out > shortly.
Alexey, Is there a particular reason that this architecture must be submitted to OpenWrt under the terms GPL v3+? I would prefer that OpenWrt stick to GPL v2 in order to maintain better compatibility with the Linux kernel (kernel.org). The kernel is primarily GPL v2 licensed (or something FreeBSD-like which is more, not less, permissive). The OpenWrt distro has only a few GPL v3 package exceptions, such as samba. The OpenWrt core team are doing a good job building a better industry-community relationship for OpenWrt, which I think can be a win-win for overall project improvement (brings in more developer resources, much like kernel development depends on industry developers). Introducing more GPL v3 packages makes it problematic for certain industry partners to be able to fully collaborate. kathy _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel