On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:41:10PM +0100, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: > > > I don't see this argument as very convincing. I mean they still have > > control even if the client ORO's 121, they could simply ignore it. On top > > of that I think there are enough clients already (Windows at least IIRC) > > who do ORO for 121 by default. > > > > So, my personal take on this is, we could ORO 121 by default but there > > should be a switch to turn that behavior off. > > > No objection from my side for this solution if the behavior can be turned > off via UCI
Ok, thanks, I'll send an updated patch then. Regards, Baptiste
pgpZzNMr7X7R4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel