On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:41:10PM +0100, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote:
> 
> > I don't see this argument as very convincing. I mean they still have
> > control even if the client ORO's 121, they could simply ignore it. On top
> > of that I think there are enough clients already (Windows at least IIRC)
> > who do ORO for 121 by default.
> >
> > So, my personal take on this is, we could ORO 121 by default but there
> > should be a switch to turn that behavior off.
> >
> No objection from my side for this solution if the behavior can be turned
> off via UCI

Ok, thanks, I'll send an updated patch then.

Regards,
Baptiste

Attachment: pgpZzNMr7X7R4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to