On 13/01/2016 12:03, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-01-13 08:50, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 13/01/2016 08:47, Wojciech Dubowik wrote: >>> ++#if defined(__UCLIBC__) >>> ++/* This syscall is not defined in uClibc 0.93.2 */ >>> ++#include <sys/syscall.h> >>> ++static int clock_adjtime(clockid_t id, struct timex *tx) >>> ++{ >>> ++ return syscall(__NR_clock_adjtime, id, tx); >>> ++} >>> ++#endif >>> ++ >> >> on ppc we are already on musl. i dont think we need to add patches for >> a libc that we do not support anymore. could you resend the patch with >> the uclibc patches removed please ? > Actually... We do have one target that still relies on uClibc - and this > package is not ppc specific. > > - Felix
which target and does it have a ptp HW ? > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel