Hi,

you are right regarding the old-style vs. new-style. I have seen this, but 
forgot about. I'll fix this with a new patch.

The Kconfig-stuff is indeed only cosmetic, but as is will not break anything I 
think it's ok. There might be no general rule if all models should be listed 
or just some examples. It may depend on the number of models for this board 
and personal mood.

I prefer upstreaming working patches, to have others taking advantage of this 
work more easily.

Sven

Am Sunday 07 February 2016, 09:00:19 schrieben Sie:
> 
> This looks wrong. You are adding new-style definitions for all revisions
> of the WR1043ND without removing the old-style definitions.
> 

> 
> The Kconfig change is not necessary at all, these strings are never seen
> by humans anyways (unless you use kernel_menuconfig or similar).
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to