Bruno Randolf <b...@einfach.org> wrote:
> On 03/05/16 18:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community
>> ...
>> Jo-Philipp Wich,
>> John Crispin,
>> Daniel Golle,
>> Felix Fietkau,
>> Hauke Mehrtens
>> John Crispin
>> Matthias Schiffer,
>> Steven Barth
> While a fresh start and a more open process is good move, given this
> list of supporters it sounds a bit ridiculous... who is left in the
> OpenWRT boat and why not do it as OpenWRT (V2 or whatever)???
I read the rest of the thread before replying.
I understand the need for a reboot and rename.
I also don't know who is left, or is being pushed out, or... maybe they left
already and didn't leave the keys? Given the FCC-inspired lockdowns, I
wonder if one has interest in GPLv3-like statements about keys.
I don't much like the name LEDE; it will be hard to explain to end users.
Reminds me too much of:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design
and http://www.leedsunited.com/
Maybe do an Apple on the case lEDE, or leDE (en francais!) or something.
asciidoc for the web site content is okay; maybe someone will contribute a
snazier style sheet (but not me; I'm pathetic at CSS too)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
