Am I correct in assuming that this is also a statement that the LEDE
members will assist in accomplishing the tasks mentioned?
On 6/27/2016 2:39 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
we started a discussion on OpenWrt re-merge conditions over at lede-dev
and waited for a while to solicit more feedback.
Since no other people expressed further wishes and since you repeatedly
asked for a list of things the LEDE folks would like to see in OpenWrt
I'm going to summarize the list the items we've assembled in
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2016-June/000144.html
In short our points are (in no particular order):
- Use the LEDE code base
- Adopt the LEDE governance rules
- Rework admin access policies
- Transfer the OpenWrt project domain to SPI
- Stop providing project email addresses
- Move mailing lists to an external, neutral provider
- Merge LEDE and OpenWrt infrastructure (wiki, forum, ...)
- Start a process for granting push access to package feed maintainers
Plus a few other items which got mentioned or agreed upon during various
discussions:
- Dissolve private channels
- Discuss project matters on public mailing lists
Note that the points above reflect mostly the opinions of Felix, John
and me. Other LEDE members might or might not endorse them, but at least
did not reject those demands.
Let me know if some of the things above are unclear to you.
Regards,
Jo
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel