On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich <j...@mein.io> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > imho it would also make sense to take any existing metric setting into > account as well. At least I'd expect that if I have a wan1 with metric > 10 and a wan2 with metric 20 that the DNS server entries "inherit" the > same weight/order. > > So priority wise I'd first order by dns metric, then by interface > metric, then by name - does that make sense to you? OK I see your point; if the dns metric is equal for the name servers the interface metric is used as extra sorting criteria. I would definitely like to define a dns metric parameter as you don't need to define an interface metric if you make use of seperate routing tables. On existing configs using interface metrics this could to a change in behavior as the DNS server order can be changed when upgrading; this is acceptable ?
Hans > > Regards, > Jo _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
