Right, so it seems it's technically in-there, maybe just not performing...
Here's an lsmod and 2 tc -s qdisc show dev eth1|ifb4eth1 showing no badness
me thinks.
root@openwrt:~# lsmod|grep ^sch_cake
sch_cake 16071 0
root@openwrt:~# tc -s qdisc show dev eth1
qdisc cake 802a: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 3584Kbit besteffort flows rtt
100.0ms raw
Sent 12207688 bytes 68580 pkt (dropped 41, overlimits 128117 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
memory used: 790400b of 4Mb
capacity estimate: 3584Kbit
Tin 0
thresh 3584Kbit
target 5.1ms
interval 100.1ms
pk_delay 30.7ms
av_delay 10.3ms
sp_delay 12us
pkts 68621
bytes 12211162
way_inds 0
way_miss 120
way_cols 0
drops 41
marks 2507
sp_flows 6
bk_flows 1
un_flows 0
max_len 1514
qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
Sent 78688860 bytes 67891 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 802b: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 85Mbit besteffort flows rtt
100.0ms raw
Sent 79761689 bytes 68235 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 62444 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
memory used: 388864b of 4250000b
capacity estimate: 85Mbit
Tin 0
thresh 85Mbit
target 5.0ms
interval 100.0ms
pk_delay 258us
av_delay 22us
sp_delay 6us
pkts 68235
bytes 79761689
way_inds 0
way_miss 129
way_cols 0
drops 0
marks 17
sp_flows 0
bk_flows 1
un_flows 0
max_len 1514
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> kmod-sched-cake is needed
>
> tc -s qdisc show your_device would probably show absence or badness.
>
> I do not think that hardware is capable of 90mbits of inbound shaping
> either.
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <mac...@soltysiak.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I gave LEDE a whirl on WNDR3800 on a 100 Mb DSL line.
> > Without SQM, speedtest.net gave around 90 Mbit/s of download and 3,6
> upload.
> > I installed sqm-scripts and the luci app and enabled SQM on eth1, set
> > ingress and egress shaping to 90% of speedtest.net results, enabled
> fq_codel
> > and simple.qos
> >
> > Now when on to dslreports bufferbloat tests and got about 42 Mbit/s.
> Great
> > bufferbloat result but ingress seems to perform at just above 50% of
> ingress
> > threshold (42 / 90% * 90).
> >
> > I don't think I've seen that drastic effect when I was on cero and then
> on
> > openwrt.
> > Anything obvious I'm doing wrong?
> >
> > Also, funny thing, there's a sqm-scripts-extra with cake and also the
> > packages seem to contain the right kernel modules, but there's not cake
> > queueing disciple in the luci UI. I found in
> /var/run/sqm/available_qdiscs
> > empty files which correspond to the dropdown in luci: codel, fq_codel,
> pie,
> > sfq. Could it be that it's just missing an empty file for cake or is that
> > something more deep?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Maciej
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openwrt-devel mailing list
> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org
>
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
