On 9 May 2017 at 10:24, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 May 2017 at 13:43, Smith, Pieter <pieter.sm...@philips.com> wrote: >> I am still hoping to get confirmation from you on this patch. Is this >> acceptable for upstreaming? >> >>> Hi Rafał, >>> >>> > > On 03/29/2017 11:53 AM, Smith, Pieter wrote: >>> > > > My apologies. I am not able to get mutt working with our corporate >>> > > > infrastructure. I hope it arrives unmangled as an attachment. If >>> > > > not, I'll use my personal mail. >>> > > >>> > > This would be acceptable for me to pick patch sent as attachment, >>> > > but you really need to sign it off with your name. Please add a >>> > > proper >>> > > Signed-off-by: >>> > > line and resend. >>> > >>> > Off-course! My bad... >>> >>> In adding more logging so that you can diagnose the issue, I tracked down >>> the root cause and fixed the issue. Attached, > please find an updated >>> patch with sign-off and a problem description. > > Sorry, it took me more time than it was supposed to. Your patch went > into the fstools repository. > > 1) LEDE master branch > We'll bump package after fixing regression caused by commit > a19f2b3c21288 ("build: disable the format-truncation warning error to > fix gcc 7 build errors") which results in: > cc1: error: -Werror=format-truncation: no option -Wformat-truncation
commit 65a3dc277f3f4 ("fstools: update to the latest version") > 2) LEDE lede-17.01 branch: > I sent patch to backport your fix: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/759957/ commit 0bef8f8011d11 ("fstools: backport regression fix for volume_identify") > 3) OpenWrt 15.05 branch: > I don't really want to mess with that. I don't know if I have > privileges nor if my patch could be accepted. We need someone working > on OpenWrt to handle this. -- Rafał _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel