On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 01/17/2018 08:41 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI <wigy...@uid0.hu>
---
package/firmware/linux-firmware/x86.mk | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/firmware/linux-firmware/x86.mk
diff --git a/package/firmware/linux-firmware/x86.mk
b/package/firmware/linux-firmware/x86.mk
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2dfe7b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/firmware/linux-firmware/x86.mk
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+Package/amd64-microcode = $(call Package/firmware-default,AMD64 CPU microcode)
+define Package/amd64-microcode/install
+ $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/lib/firmware/amd-ucode
+ $(INSTALL_DATA) $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin
$(1)/lib/firmware/amd-ucode
+ $(INSTALL_DATA) $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
$(1)/lib/firmware/amd-ucode
+ $(INSTALL_DATA) $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam16h.bin
$(1)/lib/firmware/amd-ucode
+endef
+$(eval $(call BuildPackage,amd64-microcode))
+
These microcodes are still from 2016_03_16, Debian already ships some
more recent versions which they got from Suse.
Should we upgrade the linux-firmware package to the most recent version
after these new microcodes are added and do the same for 17.01 and 15.05?
See here for the Debain changelog:
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/non-free/a/amd64-microcode/amd64-microcode_3.20171205.1_changelog
Yes, this was discussed on IRC. My impression was that the linux-firmware
git repo should be doing better than the distros in the first place, but
looks like that's not the case, so I'll move to use the amd64-microcode
from Debian.
Regards,
-w-
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
