18.08.2018 14:01, David Bauer:
Sysupgrading to ath79 from ar71xx currently fails because of mismatching
supported_devices. ar71xx is expecting "tl-mr3020" which is missing in
the ath79 image. Upgrading from ath79 is unaffected, as the image
contains the old string for ar71xx and the new one coming from the
device-tree.
Signed-off-by: David Bauer <m...@david-bauer.net>
---
target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
index 6ccc9d7dba..dadcd24b42 100644
--- a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
+++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ define Device/tplink_tl-mr3020-v1
DEVICE_TITLE := TP-LINK TL-MR3020 v1
DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-usb-core kmod-usb-chipidea2 kmod-usb-ledtrig-usbport
TPLINK_HWID := 0x30200001
- SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020-v1
+ SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020
endef
TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-mr3020-v1
I was the opinion it's the ar71xx boardname and it's added to allow an
update from the ar71xx image. But lets do the obvious and ask the
author.
Dmitry, was the SUPPORTED_DEVICES added to allow an update from the
ar71xx image?
Mathias
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
