Hello Daniel,
Answers inline.
W dniu 2018-09-12 o 04:24, Daniel F. Dickinson pisze:
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding a concise summary of what is the policy for
using multiple leds for boot/failsafe, etc status (in this case
updating CAP324 to use both colours of the 'power' led, now that such
logic in in ath79 tree).
Also are leds supposed to be named according to manufacturer or
according to model number (presuming that for ath79 we don't care
about using the same led names as for ar71xx)?
IIRC most targets use same names as for ar71xx. I'd go and review a few
other device trees for supported devices and check that, to maintain
consistency across the target.
Also pursuant to https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1062 should
CAP324 be DHCP or a static IP on it's only wired interface? (It's an
AP).
Since no decision regarding that PR was made by maintainers yet, I
believe the old policy is still in effect. I don't think that your
changes should depend on this one, and IMHO consistency is more
important here.
Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
With kind regards,
Lech
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
