"Daniel F. Dickinson" <csh...@thecshore.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This isn't my first preference, but I think this is becoming a > bit of a problem, especially for people not all that familiar > with who's who in OpenWrt. > > I've noticed that community (vs. voting committers) often jump > in with (presumably well-meant) advice that might not actually > match what voting committers want (e.g. on a patch or for > policy), and for those not familiar with emails and names of > the voting OpenWrt team this can lead to changing patches or > PR's in ways that are counter-productive to actually getting > merged. > > I'm not a voting member myself, so this isn't necessarily going > to help me get heard, but I'd also hate for someone take me as > canonical advice in contrast to a voting committer. I know some > community members can be quite helpful, but others tend to > sounding authoritative while not being an 'official' openwrt > team member, which leads to mis-perception (in my view) about > what the project would like to see.
The comments in github show this for you already: if it shows "Contributor" it's just "someone" THey might be a regular contributor, but they're not a committer. if it shows "Member" they have commit rights. What people choose to do with that information is up to them though really. Cheers, Karl P
signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
