> On 19 Dec 2018, at 09:57, Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> wrote:
> 
> On 2018-12-18 17:43, Rosen Penev wrote:
>>> 
>> I've tested removing the patch on a 512MB mt7621 device where HIGHMEM
>> is used for the second 256MB. No issues.
> I think to be on the safe side we should test running fuse (ntfs-3g or
> sshfs or something similar) on such a device. If that doesn't turn up
> any weird hangs or data corruption within a few minutes of use, I'm all
> for dropping this patch.
> 

Rosen, is that something you could take a closer look at with your 512MB device?

Kevin
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to