On Sunday, December 30, 2018 12:17:25 PM CET Petr Štetiar wrote: > In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as > the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use > generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS > files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming > there as well and provide proper examples. > > 1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist > 2. > https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation > > Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> > ---
Another source of the "gpio-keys" and the "gpio_keys_polled" node names are the binding examples in https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys-polled.txt https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt As a result, these node-names are really common in a lot of upstream bindings (I grepped around 350 gpio(_|-)keys* nodes located in various .dts and .dtsi files under linux-kernel/arch/... ). I hope you know what you are up against because unless you also do the changes upstream this will happen again and again. :\ / :) Regards, Christian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel