On Monday, 25 February 2019 02:24:56 CET Gui Iribarren wrote: > have you considered, to simplify backwards compatibility, to keep proto > "batadv" as it currently is (hardif) and naming "batadv_mesh" the new proto?
It was one of the goals to *not* name the batadv hardif interface proto
"batadv". And I wanted to have the batman-adv interface proto named "batadv"
because this is the rtnl kind string. So you actually create batman-adv
meshifs using:
ip link add dev bat0 type batadv
But we can call this proto also "batadv_meshif" if there is a strong
preference for this name.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
