пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 21:01, Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspi...@gmail.com>: > > I suggest Adrian's. I was too lazy to patch them all. Only merging > this what matters. > > пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 20:27, Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Friday, February 22, 2019 7:52:37 PM CET Dmitry Tunin wrote: > > > пт, 22 февр. 2019 г. в 21:48, Adrian Schmutzler > > > <freif...@adrianschmutzler.de>: > > > > > > > > Based on the ipq40xx commit from chunkeey, I tried to do the same for > > > > ar71xx/ath79. > > > > > > > I want to add that without this patch firmware extraction is not fast > > > enough to get it in time after a flash. That's why wireless needs a > > > restart. > > > > I have a question for you too. There are currently two competing patches > > for the ath79 10-ath9k-eeprom extraction: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/ > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047062/ > > > > Now, Dmitry' was faster with his version, but Adrian's version > > patches everything so which one should it be? > > > > (I'll write some more about the future of the extraction in the > > other thread). > > > > Cheers > > Christian > > > >
Sry for upcommenting. I think that speeding up mac patching is not really important, because it isn't too slow for a few bytes. But there is no harm. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel