Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > Behalf Of Petr Štetiar > Sent: Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2019 06:50 > To: m...@adrianschmutzler.de > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 19.07] ar71xx: fix sysupgrade to ath79 > for wndr3700v2 and wndr3800 > > m...@adrianschmutzler.de <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> [2019-09-30 22:58:22]: > > Hi, > > > ar71xx has so many similar cases like this, which nobody ever cared about, > > well this case was properly reported and I got simply interested because of > the proposed `sysupgrade -F` "fix" in that bug report. > > > maybe it would be easier to just deal with this in ath79 by setting > > SUPPORTED_DEVICES? > > I've looked at this option first, then seen different NETGEAR_KERNEL_MAGIC and > NETGEAR_HW_ID for those device and I've thought, that fixing it with > SUPPORTED_DEVICES would just make the mess worse.
I see the point, I just wasn't expecting an attempt to fix this in the very last days of ar71xx. Nevertheless, to support older devices, you would still have to add the "wndr3700" string to wndr3700v2 and wndr3800 in ath79 ... > > > On the other hand, if you really think it's worth it, > > I think, that we should avoid promoting `sysupgrade -F` as a standard upgrade > procedure for the obvious reasons. Definitely. However, I just added the "correct" name in ath79 for such cases, i.e. TP-Link WDR3600 having SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-wdr4300 etc. I will have a look whether similar fixes to yours for the TP-Link devices with similar setup are reasonable or not ... Best Adrian > > -- ynezz > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
