Current changes from Stijn's branch look fine, I've applied them to the master clone from Dec 2nd, built and flashed; mac addresses are correct, ethernet is working as well as both wifi interfaces.
On 03/12/2019, Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote: > LGTM. (Haven't checked the network setup.) :-) > > Adrian > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stijn Tintel [mailto:st...@linux-ipv6.be] >> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 13:33 >> To: Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz>; Adrian Schmutzler >> <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> >> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; pozega.tomis...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti >> LiteBeam >> AC Gen2 >> >> On 3/12/2019 14:31, Petr Štetiar wrote: >> > Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> [2019-12-03 13:17:04]: >> > >> >> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node: >> > Ok, I've checked only the parent node. >> > >> >> So, the question is whether it would make sense to remove the line for >> >> all the >> other ubnt-wa devices, too, then. >> > I would remove it, it doesn't make sense and is misleading. >> > >> > -- ynezz >> >> Updated my staging tree again: >> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/stintel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads >> /lbe-5ac-gen2 >> >> Thanks, >> Stijn > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel