On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 05:53:42PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote: > Hi, > > how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent > to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
In a way those variables should be unified into something like 'SOC'... For now, maybe 'LTQ_SOC' will do until we replace them all by 'SOC' and that should be it... Cheers Daniel > > Best > > Adrian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens > > Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49 > > To: Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org>; m...@adrianschmutzler.de > > Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com>; openwrt- > > de...@lists.openwrt.org > > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename > > > > On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote: > > > Hi Adrian, > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de > > wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's > > >> like on > > ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year. > > >> > > >> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is > > useful there, or whether it wouldn't be better to just use > > "vendor_model.dts" ... > > >> > > >> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general? > > > > > > soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not? > > > > Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is > > the common format in the Linux kernel. > > > > Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes > > to the existing files: > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216 > > > > Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at > > arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/ > > > > Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel