> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bas Mevissen [mailto:ab...@basmevissen.nl]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2020 10:54
> To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@bootlin.com>
> Cc: m...@adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto / openembedded layer (was: Re:
> dm-verity support)
> 
> On 2020-07-30 09:13, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:17:28 +0200
> > <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote:
> >
> >> your dm-verity patchset is in our patchwork since November 2019 (v2).
> >> Unfortunately, nobody seemed to be particularly interested in
> >> reviewing/merging it.
> >>
> >> Since I don't see a reason why this should change in another 8
> >> months, I'm going to finally mark it as Rejected now. After all, our
> >> resources are limited.
> >>
> 
> Isn't there some deferred or other state that better expresses the actual
> situation?

For me, "deferred" means essentially "we don't do it now, but we will do it 
later".

However, there is no indication that the situation will be different in a year 
or two. So I chose "rejected", as a waiting time of 8 months without any 
response indicate that the feature is not wanted.

As Thomas stated himself, this surely is "unfortunate", but I'm just putting 
into effect what's obvious here.

However, since it doesn't matter much after all, I can also change the patchset 
to Deferred if you really desire.
Or I could try to apply it, which would certainly fail after 8 months, and then 
mark it as "Not Applicable", which IIRC has been done for the SELinux changeset 
already.

But none of that would actually change the situation. I'm (actually) sorry, but 
I don't see a point in keeping features open for years. The interest will 
certainly not increase, but rather decrease if the patchset becomes older and 
older.

Best

Adrian

Attachment: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to