On 25/03/2021 10:09, Sergey Zakharchenko wrote:
> Hi Arnout,
>
> JFYI: Much of your patch resembles
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lede/patch/20180503100622.11168-1-i@qbox.audio/
> which was marked superseded for no apparent reason, but "anonymous
> remembers":).
It's delegated to John, so maybe he intended to rework and apply it but never
got around to it.
> As for the limits, one of them could include a timeout (e.g. no
> progress in writing to client for over 10s => ubusd closes
> connection).
Oh yes, just what we need, more complexity :-)
I agree though that timeout on Tx would make sense. It doesn't help for DoS
attacks, but it does help to protect against a frozen client.
Regards,
Arnout
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
