On 9/9/21 19:53, Florian Eckert wrote:
* resolv.conf -> /tmp/resolv.conf
* /tmp/TZmtab -> /proc/mounts

For consistency, this should also apply to `/usr/lib/os-release`.

Is there any other reason than consistency to change this?

Yes, I have to elaborate on that.
I have a small script that boots the system into a called it "sandbox" mode. If I do not save the sandbox config changes the system boots with old configuration. This means that the changes to the configurations under /etc/ are not permanently saved, because I put a tmpfs over the /etc/.

For this to work, however, I have to copy the data somewhere else beforehand and then mount it.

mkdir -p /tmp/permetc
mount --bind /etc /tmp/permetc
mount -t tmpfs -o size="3M" none /etc
cp -r /tmp/permetc/* /etc
If you already run such script, can't you hard link os-release anyway?

Now I can configure the system as I need it. If I make a mistake, I can reboot the system and the old configuration will be reloaded.

So if I want to check what has changed (sandbox config vs. bootup config).
I display a diff with the command

diff -Naur /etc/permetc/ /etc

The problem now is that the file "../usr/lib/os-release" is always shown as not existing, because it is a relative path and the file under /tmp/permetc/../usr/lib/os-release/ does not exist.

I prefer relative links because they also work when the file system is
accessed by the build system like Paul said.

But if that is the case, could we not write the data into the target file under /usr/lib/os-release and not into the linked file?
This would make such simple changes possible.
The normal case should be that the folder structure should look like on the target system just as we need it.

By the way, this is the only link that is relative (at least on my system) all others are absolute.


Looking at this I'm wondering if there is a good reason to have the file twice? From my understanding there should be only a single place to have this file?



_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to