On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:23:16PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I haven't used the UML target in the past year, but I have used it a lot
> before.
> The ability to do hostfs mounts is very nice.
> If it went away, I'd be sad, it's not a disaster as you say.
I'am also an infrequent user. I do not see an issue
for the moment, it compiles and runs just fine:
bastian@ubuntu:~/software/openwrt$ bin/targets/uml/generic/openwrt-uml-vmlinux
ubd0=bin/targets/uml/generic/openwrt-uml-squashfs.img
eth8=tuntap,,,192.168.0.254
Core dump limits :
soft - 0
hard - NONE
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking environment variables for a tempdir...none found
Checking if /dev/shm is on tmpfs...OK
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /dev/shm...OK
Adding 19591168 bytes to physical memory to account for exec-shield gap
[ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.152 (bastian@ubuntu) (gcc version 10.2.0
(Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1)) #0 Thu Oct 14 17:40:03 2021
[ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 12772
[...]
root@OpenWrt:/ :) cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : User Mode Linux
model name : UML
mode : skas
host : Linux ubuntu 5.8.0-25-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct
15 10:30:38 UTC 2020 x86_64
bogomips : 3321.03
root@OpenWrt:/ :) cat /etc/openwrt_release
DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt'
DISTRIB_RELEASE='SNAPSHOT'
DISTRIB_REVISION='r17755+24-0eed96ca5d'
DISTRIB_TARGET='uml/generic'
DISTRIB_ARCH='x86_64'
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r17755+24-0eed96ca5d'
DISTRIB_TAINTS='no-all busybox'
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
