On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:23:16PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > I haven't used the UML target in the past year, but I have used it a lot > before. > The ability to do hostfs mounts is very nice. > If it went away, I'd be sad, it's not a disaster as you say.
I'am also an infrequent user. I do not see an issue for the moment, it compiles and runs just fine: bastian@ubuntu:~/software/openwrt$ bin/targets/uml/generic/openwrt-uml-vmlinux ubd0=bin/targets/uml/generic/openwrt-uml-squashfs.img eth8=tuntap,,,192.168.0.254 Core dump limits : soft - 0 hard - NONE Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK Checking environment variables for a tempdir...none found Checking if /dev/shm is on tmpfs...OK Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /dev/shm...OK Adding 19591168 bytes to physical memory to account for exec-shield gap [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.152 (bastian@ubuntu) (gcc version 10.2.0 (Ubuntu 10.2.0-13ubuntu1)) #0 Thu Oct 14 17:40:03 2021 [ 0.000000] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 12772 [...] root@OpenWrt:/ :) cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : User Mode Linux model name : UML mode : skas host : Linux ubuntu 5.8.0-25-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15 10:30:38 UTC 2020 x86_64 bogomips : 3321.03 root@OpenWrt:/ :) cat /etc/openwrt_release DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt' DISTRIB_RELEASE='SNAPSHOT' DISTRIB_REVISION='r17755+24-0eed96ca5d' DISTRIB_TARGET='uml/generic' DISTRIB_ARCH='x86_64' DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r17755+24-0eed96ca5d' DISTRIB_TAINTS='no-all busybox' _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel