> On Aug 12, 2022, at 11:54 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One aspect I could see is take for instance a device that is widely popular > amongst our user base as was TI's ar7 for instance a while back, and for > which we might have done a Linux 5.4, or 5.10 version at the time but we do > not wish to continue to maintain. Per my previous email, that seems like something that the SoC manufacturer should be doing... Why is this our burden? _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS kernel ... Robert Marko
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS ker... Florian Fainelli
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS... Robert Marko
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year... Florian Fainelli
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6... Robert Marko
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH f... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH f... Florian Fainelli
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH f... Rich Brown
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH f... Robert Marko
- Various grant programs that c... Dave Taht
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year... Florian Fainelli
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS kernel ... Dave Taht
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS kernel versi... Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS kernel ... Florian Fainelli
- Re: Reaching out to Greg KH for 6 year LTS ker... Philip Prindeville