pt., 9 wrz 2022 o 12:30 Andrey Jr. Melnikov <temnota...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dzied...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 86 lines --] > > > pt., 9 wrz 2022 o 04:32 LiXiong Liu <lx...@ikuai8.com> napisał(a): > > > > > > ### swconfig & DSA VLAN Configuration Comparison > > [....] > > > > #bridge vlan show > > > port vlan-id > > > lan1 100 PVID Egress Untagged > > > lan2 100 PVID Egress Untagged > > > lan3 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > > lan4 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > > lan5 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > > 10 > > > br-lan 1 PVID Egress Untagged > > > 10 > > > > > > We are using smth like this: > > > config bridge-vlan 'vlan1' > > option name 'vlan1' > > option device 'br-lan' > > option vlan '1' > > option flags 'untagged pvid' > "untagged pvid" is tautology. PVID stands for "Port VLAN ID" - is a default > VLAN ID that is assigned to an access > port. Access ports only for untagged (stripped tag) frames. So, drop > 'untagged' > from options or 'pvid'. >
What in case I would like to have smth like: br-lan 1 PVID Egress Untagged 10 Egress Untagged bridge vlan <> - tool allow this configuration. Why we should add any limitation in UCI? BR Janusz > > option local '1' > > list ports 'eth2:*' > > list ports 'eth3:*' > > [...] > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel -- Janusz Dziedzic _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel