On 9/28/22 12:11, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Thomas Langer <tlan...@maxlinear.com> [2022-09-13 17:47:56]:

Hi,

Change the argp-standalone package to produce a shared library instead
of a static library for the target. The host build is not changed.

we can see that from the diff already, so we would prefer to know, why would
you like to have this change included.

argp-standalone is licensed under the LGPL. An application linking statically against it has to follow the LGPL, when an application links dynamically against it there is not need to follow LGPL.

Update related packages to add it as a direct dependency, otherwise the
buildsystem will complain.

Please check also https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/19357,
a related pull request for the packages feed, to avoid that this change
is breaking all the packages that depend on argp-standalone.

Can't this be solved in some less intrusive way? I can imagine, that this is
not going to be bisect friendly and could provide other woes in the future.

What about introducing shared library in conjunction to the static one, thus
not breaking anything? Then if it makes sense, we could convert existing
static users to shared version in a next step.

When the linker finds a static and a shared library with a matching name it will use the shared library by default. When a package is build in OpenWrt the build process has access to all libraries already build and will find the shared library. This will add an extra dependency.

When I looked on the Internet I also found this library:
https://github.com/xhebox/libuargp
It also looks like argp-standalone has some bugs:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2021/02/12/2

Maybe we should introduce libuargp as a new package which builds a shared library and place it in an own folder. Then package Makefiles which want to link against it have to modify the TARGET_FLAGS to include the extra folder.
This way we can do a slow migration to the shared library.

Hauke

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to