> Le 8 janv. 2023 à 21:53, Christian Marangi <ansuels...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:00:58PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote: >> Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com> [2023-01-06 23:49:44]: >> >> Hi Brian, >> >>> I need to express a per-target dependency on the 'base64' utility, and >>> that's seemingly impossible to do for busybox. >> >> --- a/target/linux/ipq806x/Makefile >> +++ b/target/linux/ipq806x/Makefile >> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ KERNEL_PATCHVER:=5.15 >> KERNELNAME:=zImage Image dtbs >> >> include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/target.mk >> + >> +DEPENDS:= \ >> + +@BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_BASE64 >> + >> > > Is this already used for other target? Wonder if this special thing > would cause some problem for packages of this target? Like discrepancy > with stage2 and final image?
AFAICT this isn’t used anywhere so far (at least according to a quick git grep). > Anyway this looks to be the best solution for the problem. I wonder if it’s such a good idea to have discrepancies in busybox features between targets? T _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
