Hi Tomasz, thanks a lot for that hint to dtbocfg and the makefile!
> On 21 Jan 2023, at 17:27, Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > W dniu 21.01.2023 o 16:33, Lukas Zeller pisze: >> >> So basically, I'm suggesting to revisit the decision to reject the patch >> from Daniel Golle [1]. > > Instead of doing it the hard way of patching, why not using out-of-tree kernel > module[2] for loading dtb overlay with configfs? It already exists for some > time. That really looks like a great solution with all advantages combined! I agree this is better than patching, I just did not realize it was possible at all to modularize dt overlay functionality this way. > [...] Unfortunately I didn't test it, as the board I wanted to use it has gone > in flames. For ready to use recipe see the attachment. Feel free to submit it > to packages feed and take over maintainership after giving it a test. I will certainly try that, as soon as I find some time for it, but that's not likely to happen before ~March, unfortunately... > [...] > 2. https://github.com/ikwzm/dtbocfg Lukas
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
