Hi, everyone! On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 22:28, Daniel Golle <dan...@makrotopia.org> wrote: >
[snipped] > The point here is not optimization, but finding a good compromise to > not having to compile **all** packages for **all** CPU architectures. > The same is btw also true for MIPS and ARM targets. We pick a good > compromise in terms of optimization. > Example: > * All MIPS32 targets use either mips4k or mips24k optimization -- > in reality there are plenty of mips34k and mips1004k SoCs around, > all of them happily run either of the two variants, but one could > of course produce an optimized build for e.g. mips1004kc or even > mips24kec... Actually, I wonder if we should just stop pretending 34Kc and 1004Kc-specific optimisations exist. Internally, GCC uses the 24Kc pipeline description for both 34Kc and 1004Kc (which makes sense, since they're just 24Kc's with SMT and/or multiple cores). Cheers, Rui _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel