On 2024-02-15 15:42, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 14.02.2024 21:50, Paul D wrote:
Would services not do better to be tracked within uci and its config
files in /etc/config?
Well, it's a part of a mess we have in our init/config code. It was only
last week that Jo was discussing it with Ansuel. In short we have:
1. Packages with no UCI config option for enabling/disabling
2. Packages with "enable"
3. Packages with "enabled"
4. Packages with "disable"
5. Packages with "disabled"
I'm pretty sure most users are used to enabling/disabling services
using UCI config option but not all of them have such possibility. That
is the case my change is meant to deal with.
An alternative would be to make sure every package uses "enabled" (or
"disabled") UCI option. Should we do that?
Is 'on' or 'off' in the config perhaps simpler? I think it avoids the
linguistic differences of past participle vs present simple. (Sometimes
this distinction is important to have.)
Otherwise 'en/disabled' is a good paradigm to encourage in configs.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
