Any comments?
On 2024-05-10 00:30, Paul Donald wrote: > Clamp values read from config to RFC mandated sane values instead of just > complaining. We also now implement valid_lifetime for ULA prefixes. > This is useful if you need to sunset or remove one from circulation. > ( Interestingly, if you spin up dev devices frequently which spam the > network with new ULA each time, which have no expiry, interesting things > start to happen. ) > Fixed also a bug in MTU handling. > > Paul Donald (14): > config: refactor parse_leasetime() - branch amount remains same > router: Apply updated values from RFC8319 (updates RFC4861) to RA/ND > config: clamp ra_mininterval, ra_maxinterval, ra_lifetime at load time > router: refactor calc_ra_lifetime, and define ra_lifetime as uint32_t > router: redefine ra_mininterval and ra_maxinterval as uint32_t > config: implement RFC4861 AdvValidLifetime (make configurable) > config: lease times are all UINT32_MAX; drop double size handling > router: clamp prefix valid_lt to interface valid_lifetime > config: clamp ra_reachabletime to RFC maximum (instead of complaining) > config: clamp ra_hoplimit to maximum (instead of complaining) > config: clamp ra_retranstime > config: clamp ra_mtu into 1280-65535 range > config: clamp dhcpv6_hostid_len > config: clamp dhcpv6_pd_min_len > > README | 2 + > src/config.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > src/odhcpd.h | 7 ++- > src/router.c | 34 +++++------ > src/router.h | 25 +++++++- > 5 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
