The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---> On May 18, 2025, at 4:40 PM, Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:48 AM Robert Marko <robima...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:46, Philip Prindeville >> <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On May 18, 2025, at 11:42 AM, Robert Marko <robima...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:40, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel >>>> <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows >>>>> sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. >>>>> >>>>> To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped >>>>> automatically by the mailing list software. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> >>>>> To: Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Bcc: >>>>> Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 11:39:49 -0600 >>>>> Subject: UCI changes breaking Strongswan >>>>> The function uci_lookup() went away in UCI, and now Strongswan is broken >>>>> (or at least the UCI plugin is). >>>>> >>>>> It’s not clear what the equivalent replacement logic should be, using >>>>> uci_lookup_next() or uci_lookup_ptr(), etc. >>>>> >>>>> If one of the UCI maintainers could review and comment on: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/25353 > That PR probably works. Feel free to merge. I’d like a little more certainty than “probably”. Given it’s a 2-line patch you wouldn’t think finding a knowledgeable reviewer would be that hard… [cough] >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I pushed a fix making the UCI plugin depend on @BROKEN as its been >>>> broken for like 9 years or so and OpenWrt >>>> itself does not need it. >>>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/commit/a8c89a0c77b71c1699c57b7c6d70b034a271d678 >>>> >>>> So, it should now compile. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Robert >>> >>> >>> Thanks for doing that. I’m thinking that it’s a relatively straightforward >>> change to get it working again, if one of the UCI maintainers can give a >>> couple of minutes of guidance. >> >> Its probably not worth to put any time into the Strongswan UCI plugin, >> given that its been broken for so long as it relied on API that is >> long gone >> then probably nobody cares about it. >> >> Regards, >> Robert >> >>> >>> -Philip >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> that would be really helpful. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -Philip >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
