#17510: /60 rather than /64 IPv6 'interface' route created on LAN interface
-----------------------------+-----------------------------------
  Reporter:  markzzzsmith@…  |      Owner:  developers
      Type:  defect          |     Status:  reopened
  Priority:  normal          |  Milestone:
 Component:  base system     |    Version:  Barrier Breaker 14.07
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------+-----------------------------------
Changes (by markzzzsmith@…):

 * status:  closed => reopened
 * resolution:  not_a_bug =>


Comment:

 If the more specific /64 route prefix is created when delegated to a
 downstream router, then there is no purpose to the /60. All it will do is
 cause problems. This is completely inconsistent with how IPv6 routing is
 configured, which is why I reported it. I've done a lot of work with
 IPv6+, if it is confusing to me then it will be confusing to people who
 don't understand it nearly as well as I do.

 For example, attempting to ping a non-existent existent address on a non-
 existent prefix should cause the router to generate a destination
 unreachable message. For /64s outside of this /60 OpenWRT does (due to
 'unreachable' /48), but for non-existent prefixes within the /60 it
 doesn't. e.g.,

 [mark@opy ~]$ ping6 fd0f:f1b5:2af:000f::1
 PING fd0f:f1b5:2af:000f::1(fd0f:f1b5:2af:f::1) 56 data bytes
 ^C
 --- fd0f:f1b5:2af:000f::1 ping statistics ---
 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 999ms

 [mark@opy ~]$ ping6 fd0f:f1b5:2af:0010::1
 PING fd0f:f1b5:2af:0010::1(fd0f:f1b5:2af:10::1) 56 data bytes
 From fd0f:f1b5:2af::1 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: No route
 ^C
 --- fd0f:f1b5:2af:0010::1 ping statistics ---
 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss, time 0ms

 [mark@opy ~]$

 Silent failure can cause long application timeouts that create bad user
 experiences. This causes them unnecessarily.

 + And have worked with IPv6 CPE vendors and presented on what not to do:
 "IPv6 CPE - What Not To Do and Other Observations"
 
http://www.ausnog.net/sites/default/files/ausnog-05/presentations/ausnog-05-d02p02
 -mark-smith.pdf

--
Ticket URL: <https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17510#comment:2>
OpenWrt <http://openwrt.org>
Opensource Wireless Router Technology
_______________________________________________
openwrt-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-tickets

Reply via email to