On Sep 20 21:05 +0100, Simon Iremonger wrote: > >>Also, last time I checked OpenWRT uses dnsmasq to run the DNS forwarder > >>[which can acually accept requests over either IPv4 and IPv6, in order > >>to forward them on ....] -- but dns mak is also the DHCPv4 server. > >>Basically if you disable dnsmasq one way or another this can work. > >and enable odhcpd for example? i can live with that if i can figure out how > >to build dnsmasq without the dhcp server part which shouldn't be > >impossible (don't have much space to spare, 1M max). > Don't bothe -- just turn off dnsmasq entirely. You can point clients > directly to the NAT64 nameserves via RADVD/DHCPv6-stateles [I'd try without > the latter entirely actually...]. Tat way you just don't > need dnsmasq a all.
i meant in the building process. i can't change configs because i have no overlay (another subject) and kernel remount the / read-only. anyway, what i was getting at there was the dhcp-server part of dnsmaq and if _that_ could be disabled. > >but to be clear, looking at my settings, especially the 'lan' section in > >/etc/config/network, you think that has nothing in it that would trigger > >the dns server (dnsmasq in my case) to send out IPv4? > No wll DNSmasq has ALAYS done that that what its' for in part ).. You may > hwever be able to 'disable' DHCPv4 which would be sensibel. I expect > there is a way to do this without recompiling it!! so this has no effect whatever on the lan creation? config interface lan ... option ipaddr '192.168.1.1' option netmask '255.255.255.0' ... > >>I think, if you use 2001:8b0:6464::1 and 2001:8b0:6464::2 as > >>DNS resolves, you can use the NAT64 gateway even from a non-AAISP > >>IPv6 connection, at the moment... see:- > >>http://aa.net.uk/kb-broadband-ipv6-nat64.html > >i thought HE's own dns server would do that. i will have a look at the one > What!?!? Why... > He just provide IPv6 connectivity tunnel for those already with IPv4. > Would make no sense to thn use that to provide IPv4 to me but apparently > thats' what you want .. puzzle! well then i have to admit i'm still not clear why they have this 'Free DNS' thing. > >>Be vey intersted to know what you dicover in terms of OSes/software > >>that do/don't properly support IPv6-only operation. > >will report back here. > k > There is an aricle on thi here:- > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6586.txt > > > --simon goodies, reading on. thanks. _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
