Hi Brian, I thought DIR-615 was marked as a bad device for VLAN tagging due to the chipset it uses.Nevertheless I have one close to me (H1 version) but I don't have the time to compile an image for it. If you send me that image (H1) I can try to check it out, meaning that it's a long time that I don't use it and I'm not sure it works bur I can give it a go.
Thanks Alex On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a DIR-615 running 14.07. I have the switch configured as such: > > VLAN 1: > vid: 1 > ports: 0t 1t 2 3 4t > VLAN 2: > vid: 100 > ports: 0t 1t 4t > > When I plug a machine into port 2 of the router (which is port 3 of the > switch) and try to ping something that is on vlan 1 I can see by > monitoring (i.e. wireshark) what is being sent out on port 4 (port 1 of > the switch) that the vlan 1 traffic (i.e. the ARPs to resolve the > Ethernet address of what I am trying to ping via port 2) is actually > being tagged for vlan "0". > > Do I have something wrong in my switch configuration? Here is my full > network configuration: > > config interface 'loopback' > option ifname 'lo' > option proto 'static' > option ipaddr '127.0.0.1' > option netmask '255.0.0.0' > > config interface 'lan' > option type 'bridge' > option _orig_ifname 'eth0 radio0.network1' > option _orig_bridge 'true' > option proto 'dhcp' > option hostname 'wireless' > option ifname 'eth0.1' > > config interface 'wan' > option ifname 'eth1' > option proto 'dhcp' > > config switch > option reset '1' > option enable_vlan '1' > option name 'switch0' > > config switch_vlan > option vlan '1' > option vid '1' > option device 'switch0' > option ports '0t 1t 2 3 4t' > > config interface 'guest' > option type 'bridge' > option _orig_ifname 'wlan0-1' > option _orig_bridge 'true' > option proto 'static' > option ipaddr '192.168.101.160' > option netmask '255.255.255.0' > option gateway '192.168.101.254' > option ifname 'eth0.100' > > config switch_vlan > option device 'switch0' > option vlan '2' > option vid '100' > option ports '0t 1t 4t' > > Any thoughts? Is my configuration at least right/wrong? > > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users > >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
