On 2013-05-22 19:54, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kim Alvefur <z...@zash.se> wrote: > >> On 2013-05-22 18:22, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >>> PS: I am wondering whether the claimed chat spam problems mentioned in >> the press articles are actually true? >> >> It matches what was said before, search this list for "spammy invites". >> >> > I'm with PSA on this one - I think it's wild exaggeration, just as branding > all the myriad of domains which federated on good terms as being > "insignificant" was similarly rhetoric.
I just wanted to point out that they are at least being consistent. Whether that means they were planning this from the start or just suffer from broken internal communications ... I don't really care, but look forward to enforcing TLS on s2s connections. Also, > Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -- Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
