Hi, On Wednesday 19 November 2014 11:35:08 Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: > On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote: > > On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: > >> 3. Increased maintenance cost of the build system, cmake modules > >> especially. > > > > http://rolk.github.io/2013/09/23/build-system-sync/ > > Wouldn't it be better if this wasn't necessary?
I consider this a unfortunate design decision for the build system which was
made about 1.5 years ago, but _not_ a fundamental problem with using separate
repos for separate modules. What this mandates instead is a distributed build
system akin the DUNE one, in my opinion.
> > Were it not for the fact that opm-core depends on opm-parser I would
> > be able to download "only" opm-core and get access to powerful grid
> > processing routines, an implementation of mimetic discretisations
> > (somewhat languishing but nevertheless working), partial support for
> > the multi-scale mixed finite-element method, time-of-flight solvers
> > based on the reordering technique, explicit and implicit solvers for
> > two-phase incompressible transport problems. In essence, fundamental
> > tools for doing simple calculations in porous media applications.
>
> git clone -b opm-core github.com:opm-project
... and you and up at exactly the current situation, but you have to specify
the modules via branch names ;)
cheers
Andreas
--
In the GNU Project, we do not "obey" standards. Rather, we take
them into account when judging what is best for the program to do.
— Richard Stallman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
