Hi Joakim,
Thanks so much for the answers and they helps a lot. It's much clear right now. Best regards, Ye Li ________________________________ From: Joakim Hove <joakim.h...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 6:50 AM To: Ye Li; opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [Opm] About json (jsonObject) class in the "opm-common" module. ◆ This message was sent from a non-UWYO address. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments from external sources. 1, in the Class ParserKeyword, a new data type "Json::JsonObject" was introduced. I don't understand what the purpose for this new data. If we just use Class ParserItem and Class ParserRecord, could the parse process be done? In principle you do not need the Json; the whole purpose of the Json thing is to configure (compile time) the keywords which are recognized by the parser. The keywords are configured using json files: https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/tree/master/src/opm/parser/eclipse/share/keywords - the use of Json for this is an implementation detail, any other input format, or just plain C++ code could in principle have been instead. I am one of the main guilty behind that system, and personally I think it has worked well. Others might disagree. [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1827197?s=400&v=4]<https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/tree/master/src/opm/parser/eclipse/share/keywords> OPM/opm-common<https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/tree/master/src/opm/parser/eclipse/share/keywords> github.com Common components for OPM, in particular build system (cmake). - OPM/opm-common > 2, is the json in "opm-common" the same as the JSON (Open-Standard File > Format) ? Yes
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
