Hi, Dave

edited a draft there and used the wiki "share" botton to share to lots of 
people already, includes you :)

here is the link

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Ipv6


best regards

/MatthewLi

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Dave Neary [mailto:dne...@redhat.com] 
发送时间: 2016年8月4日 23:20
收件人: Lijun (Matthew); Prakash Ramchandran; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: OPNFV [Dovetall] Meeting Summary

Please share the link when you have created the page.

Thanks!
Dave.

On 08/02/2016 03:19 AM, Lijun (Matthew) wrote:
> Hi
> 
>  
> 
> I will create a wiki page about the ipv6, so everyone can see the 
> details and edit.
> 
>  
> 
> /MatthewLi
> 
>  
> 
> *发件人:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *代表 *Prakash 
> Ramchandran
> *发送时间:*2016年7月30日0:02
> *收件人:*opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *主题:*[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV [Dovetall] Meeting Summary
> 
>  
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
> Since Tianhongbo could not make to the Got meeting or IRC, the meeting 
> was IRC only on #opnfv-meeting
> 
>  
> 
> Since the time ran past 8.00 due to late start besides wanted to 
> summarize what can we retain from last 2-3 meetings besides today to 
> consolidate Actionable Items and responsibilities...
> 
>  
> 
> meetbot to make sure we take proper minutes during meeting on 
> irc..Thanks Prakash
> 
>  [08:06] <@collabot>
> Minutes:        
> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-07-29-14.25.html
> 
> [08:06] <@collabot> Minutes (text):
> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv
> -meeting.2016-07-29-14.25.txt
> 
> [08:06] <@collabot>
> Log:            
> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-07-29-14.25.log.html
> 
> [08:06] <dneary> #info ChrisPriceAB proposes that we start a wiki page 
> to define test case requirements, structure, and the procedure for 
> considering new tests.
> 
> [08:06] <dneary> I guess that didn't get minuted...
> 
> [08:06] <dneary> Thanks everyone, feels like we made progress
> 
>  
> 
> Please if you want it delegated to someone else please respond back
> 
>  
> 
> Maybe we can spin up a wiki page under dovetail to walk through our 
> test case requiremenents. Happy to start that.(ChrisPriceAB 
> <http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnf
> v-meeting.2016-07-29-14.25.log.html#l-100>,
> 14:46:54)
> 
> *Action 1:*Chris Price to spin wiki page for dovetail test case 
> requirements and others can help to update it based on some structure 
> which Chris can propose
> 
> *Action 2:*Prakash will update the C&C guidance as listed below as 
> request to Dovetail from C&C and we can debate it next week to
> 
> *Action 3:*Dave Neary to review and point any deviations we have here 
> from the agreed scope of Dovetail and any concerns he has on SDNC, 
> Installers etc. for use case testing or suggestions to help spirit of 
> OPNFV to keep it Open to all
> 
> *Action 4:*Mathew Li - summarize IPv6  overlay (underlay out of scope 
> for now) test efforts  that are taken up in different projects and 
> consolidation of same for Dovetail once Chris Price spins the wiki 
> with some structure to present
> 
>  
> 
> Here are my note from last  two meeting*Action 2*
> 
> Note C&C inputs to Dovetail  : Prakash has  summary of  C&C request as 
> proposed by Chris Donley
> 
> ·         Chris Donley specified  directions to Dovetail stating that
> time is essence and we need to fit into plans to get Dovetail moving 
> as the value for OPNFV by working with Compliance Verification Program
> (CVP) guidance.
> 
> ·         There was discussions on API vs. Use case (Blackbox) Approach.
> 
> ·         Since API from OPNFV projects are yet to be compiled and gap
> assessed with respect to ETSI TST APIs for many projects that have 
> MANO implications, the baseline currently appears to be OPENSTACK + 
> SDNC  and NB APIs are going to take time to settle.
> 
> ·         A black box approach with use cases in Release C that were
> taken up as part of roadmap and that will be addressed between SP & 
> C&C while Dovetail should focus on use cases that were taken up in 
> Release C under different projects.
> 
> ·         While OPNFV MANO Working group can address cross-project
> co-ordination , the testing can be based on Use cases with low bar to 
> qualify at start and discussions moved to Dovetail framework and use 
> cases to consider.
> 
>  
> 
> Dovetail framework  and use case discussions we had earlier can for 
> now be expunged and revisit it after wiki is spun by Chris Price at 
> next weekly meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Prakash
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> *Prakash Ramchandran*
> 
> logo_huawei* R&D USA*
> 
> *FutureWei Technologies, Inc*
> 
> Email:prakash.ramchand...@huawei.com <mailto:s.c...@huawei.com>
> 
> Work:  +1 (408) 330-5489
> 
> Mobile:+1 (408) 406-5810
> 
> 2330 Central Expy, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA
> 
>       
> 
> / /
> 
> / /
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to