Hi Hongbo,
If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to use opnfv-meeting. I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create another IRC channel for this meeting series. My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our committers indicated a desire to stay on opnfv-meeting and it is unclear why this has come up again. / Chris From: <opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> on behalf of Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com> Date: Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 03:02 To: Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Hi all: With the development of dovetail, there are more people involved in. we used the opnfv-meeting before. In order to help people to discuss whenever and wherever, I suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for dovetail discussion. If we have dovetail own IRC, it can avoid the conflict. We tested it, it works. Any comments? Best Regards hongbo _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
