Hi, With Feng's help (thank you once more!) I made this changes also for lf-pod2.
Regards, Michal > On 16 Sep 2016, at 15:30, Michal Skalski <mskal...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > Sorry I missed this discussion, is there any updates related to applying this > configuration on LF pod? > On LF POD2 we currently observe problems with dpdk, and I thought that it > could be related. > > Thanks, > Michal >> On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:00, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> +1 on the config change. >> >> Background: If one wants to switch to Rx scatter mode for 1 queue or use >> more than 1 RQ, one really does have to configure on the VNIC 2x the number >> needed by the DPDK app. There is no way around this in the current >> implementation and is the way Rx scatter works on the VIC, where Rx Scatter >> spill-over buffers are on a 2nd RQ . Hence the general advice is to >> configure 2x the number of RQs needed. This will also be reflected in the >> next revision of the ENIC driver documentation. Longer term, there is a plan >> to eliminate the 2nd RQ in general (not just for 1 RQ) when Rx scatter is >> disabled but this is probably happening post the 16.11 DPDK release. >> >> Frank >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org >> [mailto:fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rozet >> Sent: Montag, 29. August 2016 18:17 >> To: infra-steer...@lists.opnfv.org >> Cc: Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@mirantis.com>; Sean Chandler (sechandl) >> <secha...@cisco.com>; fds-...@lists.opnfv.org; OPNFV Tech >> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> >> Subject: [Fds-dev] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles >> >> Hi, >> We need to configure 2 RQs on VIC profiles in the UCS manager for DPDK to >> work. From what I understand we can make the configuration change and it >> won't take effect until the blades are rebooted. For Apex, we need POD 1 to >> have this configuration for FDIO/and OVS DPDK to daily jobs to pass. Before >> I make the change, just want to make sure no one is against it. Also, do >> you want me to make the same configuration change for LF POD2 for Fuel? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tim Rozet >> Red Hat SDN Team >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fds-dev mailing list >> fds-...@lists.opnfv.org >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/fds-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
