Folks we will switch to every other week when there are technical topics to discuss. Bin doesn't think there are enough topics to run every other week. Basically polestar will take the week sessions which Bin's sessions doesn't use.
On Monday, October 10, 2016, Christopher Price <chrispric...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > I think we may want to think a little loner on this. > > I tend to agree that we have overlap in interested parties between the > tech-discuss calls and Polestar which is good and healthy, but I don’t see > that they serve such a common purpose that we would cancel tech-discuss to > schedule a polestar meeting. What happens if someone wants to review a > project or technical contribution that week? I don’t think we should > offset the only general purpose community call we have established. > > > > A longer term solution to this may be to find an alternative time for > Polestar or accept that it may run in parallel to the community meetings. > > > > / Chris > > > > > > *From: *<opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org');>> > on behalf of Margaret Chiosi <margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com');>> > *Date: *Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 20:36 > *To: *"HU, BIN" <bh5...@att.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bh5...@att.com');>> > *Cc: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org');>> > *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > Bin ok. > > Min let's cancel next Thursday. > > On Saturday, October 8, 2016, HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bh5...@att.com');>> wrote: > > Sure. I am very happy to have you have the following week (Oct 20). > > > > Because there is not many new project proposals or community issues to > discuss now, essentially you may have most of weeks down the road. If there > are new proposals or other community issues for discussion, I will let you > and Min know and we may have alternate weeks. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Thanks > > Bin > > > > *From:* Margaret Chiosi [mailto:margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2016 12:48 PM > *To:* HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> > *Cc:* Ulrich Kleber <ulrich.kle...@huawei.com>; Raymond Paik < > rp...@linuxfoundation.org>; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > So when is your next call? also if you have one next week then can you let > me have my polestar the following week? thanks > > On Oct 7, 2016, at 1:13 PM, HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you Margaret. > > > > Let’s coordinate in the future if many people intend to participate in > both. > > > > Thanks > > Bin > > > > *From:* Margaret Chiosi [mailto:margaretchiosi.o...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, October 07, 2016 2:58 AM > *To:* Ulrich Kleber <ulrich.kle...@huawei.com> > *Cc:* HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com>; Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>; > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > Sure we can cancel our call if there is the true hbical community call. > Bin just needs to coordinate with me and min. > > On Friday, October 7, 2016, Ulrich Kleber <ulrich.kle...@huawei.com> > wrote: > > I think we should consider the overlap with the technical community call. > > It is not only about GTM accounts, but about people. There are several > people who want to participate in both. > > Can we still solve this? > > (sorry, I forgot to raise it during the call due to the lively discussion > on terminology and scope of “onboarding”) > > Cheers, > > Uli > > > > *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org[ > mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]*On** Behalf Of *HU, BIN > *Sent:* Thursday, 06 October, 2016 23:51 > *To:* Raymond Paik > *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > Sounds good, and thank you Ray > > > > Bin > > *From:* Raymond Paik [mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:49 PM > *To:* HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> > *Cc:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com>; opnf > v-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > Bin, > > > > It's a separate one (username: commit...@opnfv.org*)* from the project > calls so there shouldn't be conflicts with the technical discussion meeting > on Thursday. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ray > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, HU, BIN <bh5...@att.com> wrote: > > Ray, > > > > What is the GTM account Polestar WG regularly uses? > > > > I see the time overlap with technical discussion on Oct 13. We use the > initial GTM account in weekly technical discussion on Oct 13. > > > > Thanks > > Bin > > > > *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailt > o:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Raymond Paik > *Sent:* Thursday, October 06, 2016 12:19 PM > *To:* Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com> > > > *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > > > All, > > > > Apologies for the inconvenience. We realized late last night that > Polestar was using the same GTM account as the Board meeting and there's an > overlap between Polestar & Board meeting. > > > > This won't be the case going forward... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ray > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com> > wrote: > > Same disappointment for me. > > The wiki also incorrectly listed the meeting on Oct 5. I was left > wondering whether I missed the meeting because of wrong date. I didn't > think it could be because of wrong bridge. > > Wenjing > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailt > o:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Christopher > Price > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:24 AM > To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com> > Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 > > I fated the same way as Dave. I would also like to see the times and > bridges settled. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 18:02, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you Min, > > > > Unfortunately I was not online, and joined the incorrect bridge from > > my phone. I am disappointed I missed another meeting. > > > > Can meeting details be confirmed a little further in advance for > > future meetings? > > > > Regards, > > Dave. > > > >> On 10/06/2016 08:54 AM, Min Yu wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> Please use the bridge info below to join today's Polestar call. My > >> apologies for the last minute change. > >> > >> OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call > >> > >> Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. > >> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/158053245 > >> > >> You can also dial in using your phone. > >> United States (Toll-free) 1 877 309 2070 United States +1 (571) > >> 317-3116 > >> > >> Access Code: 158-053-245 > >> > >> > >> First GoToMeeting? Try a test > >> session: http://help.citrix.com/getready > >> <http://help.citrix.com/getready> > >> -- > >> Min Yu > >> Client Services Coordinator > >> The Linux Foundation > >> +1(530) 902-6464 (m) > >> m...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:m...@linuxfoundation.org> > >> Skype: minyudecorah > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > >> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > > > -- > > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red > > Hat - http://community.redhat.com > > Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 > > _______________________________________________ > > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > > > > > > > -- > > Margaret Chiosi > > > > > > -- > > Margaret Chiosi > > > _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss > mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org');> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > -- Margaret Chiosi
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
