Hi all: I have a suggestion:
Can we use this kind of categories: 1) outstanding committers 2) outstanding contributors 3) outstanding PTL 4) innovation awards 5) Community support/leadership this kind of categories may encourage more people to act as the community roles such as PTL.etc. and make the contributions. From this perspective, the majority contribution of release may be recognized. Two cents. hongbo 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Yujun Zhang (ZTE) 发送时间: 2017年2月8日 14:50 收件人: Raymond Paik 抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion The category looks good. I think we may need publish key indicators and selection process for these awards to make it open and transparent. Not sure there is already some policy defined by TSC. My two cents. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: That's correct... On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Yujun Zhang (ZTE) <zhangyujun+...@gmail.com<mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>> wrote: less frequently => do you mean from every quarter to each release? On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:21 AM Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Reviving the discussion after the Chinese New Year holidays... I wanted to propose the following new categories. Also, since we're doing these awards less frequently we can award more than one person in each category (shown in numbers in parentheses). * Code development (3) * Community support/leadership (3) * Integration (3) * Testing (3) * Interns (2) Thoughts/comments? Thanks, Ray On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Yujun Zhang <zhangyujun+...@gmail.com<mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>> wrote: We may also consider recognition for Leadership. The candidates could be * Working group leader/coordinators * PTLs * Outstanding core developer who leads some in-project or cross-project subject On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:31 AM Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:rp...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: All, Following up on our discussion on the TSC call. A number of people made a suggestion to move away from quarterly awards and have community recognition after each release (in addition to annual awards at the Summit). For the Quarterly Awards, we have been selecting winners for the following 5 categories * Code development * Collaboration * Documentation & User Support * Integration * Testing If we move to release-based awards, should we keep the same categories? Morgan made the comment about recognizing interns, so we could add a new category for interns. Also, how should voting be done? In the past, nominations came from all community members but the voting was done by TSC members. Let me know your thoughts or if you have other suggestions. Thanks, Ray _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- Yujun Zhang -- Yujun Zhang
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
