Hi jose: Appreciate your effort on the cooperation.
Let transform the information to the action items. See you in the dovetail meeting. Best regards hongbo 发件人: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年2月23日 17:35 收件人: Tianhongbo; Christopher Price; 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' 主题: RE: [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24 Hi, During the first 2 days at the PTG, I have been talking to the Interop WG and to the RefStack PTL to grab as much info as I could about how they are doing certification and what tools they use. They are excited about this collaboration and willing to work with us on this initiative but need our help. Please let me expose during the call the feedback I got, open questions and the action points for us. Then, we can think about a plan and how to start executing things as soon as possible. Thanks, Jose From: Tianhongbo [mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 05:42 AM To: Christopher Price; 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Cc: Jose Lausuch Subject: 答复: [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24 Hi Chris: Ok, I will put these as the first point on the agenda. Yes, that is true that before the dovetail wok, we need to get the clear strategy from the CVP. Last week, wenjing shared the feedback from board. We can discuss and get the consensus on that. It will make the dovetail go to right direction. Thank you for participating the joint discussion for the interp WG and OPNFV. I will put that on the agenda to see how the dovetail and interop WG can cooperate. For the test case results and tool, we have discussed several times in the test group. We have the consensus that the dovetail will use as much as possible from the test group. I will put this on the agenda, let us make this more clear. Best regards hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年2月22日 17:50 收件人: Tianhongbo; 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' 抄送: Jose Lausuch 主题: Re: [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24 Hi Hongbo, I would like to ensure we are discussing the CVP test strategy document as a priority point on the agenda. My recollection of the discussion from last week was that our Jira planning, utilization and structure would be best done in conjunction with the document of how we will test and structure our work. This may be best to try and achieve consensus on before we start to dig into Jira task tracking directly to ensure everyone has a chance to understand what is being discussed. Given the strategy document has been clearly identified as a pre-requisite to our program it feels like something we should prioritize. As the PTG was this week and we had a number of people there discussing an NFV compliance suite with the interop WG to discuss integration with OPNFV testing WG activities I think we should likely include a readout of that as a topic point. For the test case results, could we have a discussion around how we might use (or clone) the existing test result collection and reporting mechanisms we use for our testing projects. I do not recall if there were any specific requirements from the CVP that prohibit us from using those, or adding any missing capabilities. But it would be worth discussing that I think. Leveraging our upstream communities and mechanisms will require us to have a clear structure and process for result handling that likely should not be handled in the execution processes but rather a specific server based solution. / Chris From: Tianhongbo <hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>> Date: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 at 06:07 To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>, Christopher Price <christopher.pr...@ericsson.com<mailto:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com>>, Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com<mailto:dne...@redhat.com>>, "'marko.a.kui...@nokia.com'" <marko.a.kui...@nokia.com<mailto:marko.a.kui...@nokia.com>>, "'Rautakumpu, Mika (Nokia - FI/Espoo)'" <mika.rautaku...@nokia.com<mailto:mika.rautaku...@nokia.com>>, "'sheng-ann...@ericsson.com'" <sheng-ann...@ericsson.com<mailto:sheng-ann...@ericsson.com>>, "'yangjian...@chinamobile.com'" <yangjian...@chinamobile.com<mailto:yangjian...@chinamobile.com>>, "'zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn'" <zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn>>, "'HU, BIN'" <bh5...@att.com<mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, "'l...@biigroup.cn'" <l...@biigroup.cn<mailto:l...@biigroup.cn>>, 'Tetsuya Nakamura' <t.nakam...@cablelabs.com<mailto:t.nakam...@cablelabs.com>>, Wenjing Chu <wenjing....@huawei.com<mailto:wenjing....@huawei.com>>, "Christopher Donley (Chris)" <christopher.don...@huawei.com<mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>>, Jose Angel Lausuch Sales <jose.laus...@ericsson.com<mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>>, "Lijun (Matthew)" <matthew.li...@huawei.com<mailto:matthew.li...@huawei.com>> Subject: [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24 时间: 2017年2月24日星期五 22:00-23:00(UTC+08:00)北京，重庆，香港特别行政区，乌鲁木齐。 注意: 以上 GMT 时差并不反映夏令时调整。 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Hi all: Last week, we have hot topic for the discussion on the dovetail plan. Let us continue and have efficient plan for dovetail. The agenda for this week: 1）dovetail development plan（ milestone and schedule）,jira consensus and approach-----wenjing, bryan and Lincoln Lavoie 2）Test case run results history info gathering and display - Matthew 3）update of authentication for dovetail tool ------leo 4）jenkins jobs reqirement for dovetail ---uli from infra group 5）Other open issues: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/collabrationofdovetail If you have other topics for the agenda, do not hesitate to let us know. Meeting information: • Weekly on Friday at 1400-1500 UTC • Gotomeeting Access • https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/969604901 • United States +1 (224) 501-3318 • Access Code: 458-547-813 • IRC channel • #opnfv-meeting@ Freenode (Web Chat) • For more detail, please refer to : • https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail Best Regards hongbo
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
