Hi Wenjing, Thank you for your taking topic into the meeting. I will join this meeting, so let's discuss about it.
thanks, Tomofumi On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Wenjing Chu <[email protected]> wrote: > Great point Tomofumi. I will take this topic to tomorrow’s Dovetail call. > From Dovetail perspective, even if we do not impose the HTTPS-only > hardening, we must at least support such systems. Thanks. > > > > Wenjing > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tomofumi > Hayashi > *Sent:* Thursday, March 02, 2017 5:14 AM > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][dovetail] OpenStack HTTPS > transport support in functest/dovetail > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Let me clarify HTTPS support status and plan of > functest/yardstick/dovetail. > > > > I tried to run functest/dovetail against TripleO deployment and find that > functest script, leveraged by dovetail, only works with HTTP (!= HTTPS) for > OpenStack API (see verify_connectivity(): functest/ci/check_os.py). In > addition, more modification is required certificate (such as self-signed > one). > > > > At that time, OPNFV testing project is mainly consumed by OPNFV platforms > (e.g. Apex). But in the future, at least dovetail should be used for C&C > (compliance and certification) in various OpenStack platform and some of > them does not support HTTP transport for OpenStack API (mostly due to > security reason). So I suppose we should support HTTPS OpenStack API in > dovetail and functest. > > > > What do you think about it? > > > > Regards, > > Tomofumi >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
